As this important piece of historical research I did is being censored I am resharing here, as despite all the publicity it has received nobody has bothered to do a thorough translation of the Narragansett Runestone, partly because people have overfocused on the authenticity of that Runestone, and those who tried to made glaring errors in translation. The claim by everett and warren brown that the Narragansett Runestone is their modern creation, though plausible, is certainly not believable. The two major investigations into that Runestone, by Scott Wolter and by Uppsala University, make glaring errors, the former by overfocusing on one odd rune, the latter by overfocusing on grammar and ignoring the runic names and multiple meanings. Here I shall clarify this, having studied the Runes in depth and having a strong familiarity with the area the Runestone was found. To be specific, the Narragansett Runestone has nine Runic images, the first seven are in top ...